ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
87.8%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
92.5%
in 2013
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
150th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
  • Zimbabwe
0255075100199420092024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 92.5% against 87.8% in ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119), a difference of 4.7%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)'s.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 221 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 60.2% 94.4% 34.3% Zimbabwe
2000s 64.1% 99.7% 35.5% Zimbabwe
2010s 83.0% 93.1% 10.2% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 92.5% against 87.8% in ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zimbabwe?
4.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
How do ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/zimbabwe/">ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release