ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
100.8%
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
105.3%
in 2024
ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) rank
45th
Hong Kong, China rank
42nd

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411)
  • Hong Kong, China
0255075100199720102024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 105.3% against 100.8% in ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411), a difference of 4.5%.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) ranks 45th and Hong Kong, China ranks 42nd of 221 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 82.7% 100.0% 17.4% Hong Kong, China
2010s 96.6% 103.8% 7.2% Hong Kong, China
2020s 100.7% 101.9% 1.2% Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 105.3% against 100.8% in ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) and Hong Kong, China?
4.5%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) and Hong Kong, China?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) ranks 45th and Hong Kong, China ranks 42nd of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-ldc-ldc-e-unsdcode-98411/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-ldc-ldc-e-unsdcode-98411/hong-kong-sar-china/">ESCAP: Ldc (ldc_e) (unsdcode:98411) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release