ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437)
100.4%
in 2024
Libya
103.7%
in 2006
ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) rank
56th
Libya rank
58th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437)
  • Libya
0255075100125199420092024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 103.7% against 100.4% in ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437), a difference of 3.3%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 58th of 221 groups.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) or Libya?
Libya, at 103.7% against 100.4% in ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) as of 2006.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) and Libya?
3.3%, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) and Libya?
5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
How do ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) ranks 56th and Libya ranks 58th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-wb-upper-middle-income-economies-wb-upper-mid-unsdcode-98437/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-wb-upper-middle-income-economies-wb-upper-mid-unsdcode-98437/libya/">ESCAP: Wb Upper Middle Income Economies (wb_upper_mid) (unsdcode:98437) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release