Libya vs SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Libya
103.7%
in 2006
SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand
100.4%
in 2024
Libya rank
58th
SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand rank
59th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Libya
- SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 103.7% against 100.4% in SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3.3%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 58th and SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand ranks 59th of 199 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Libya or SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand?
- Libya, at 103.7% against 100.4% in SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Libya and SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand?
- 3.3%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do Libya and SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Libya ranks 58th and SDG: Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand ranks 59th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release