Suriname vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

Suriname
83.8%
in 2022
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
83.7%
in 2024
Suriname rank
171st
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
174th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Suriname
  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
0255075100199720102024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 83.8% against 83.7% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 171st and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 174th of 199 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Difference Ahead
2000s 96.5% 69.9% 26.5% Suriname
2010s 96.8% 82.0% 14.8% Suriname
2020s 92.3% 84.6% 7.8% Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Suriname or WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
Suriname, at 83.8% against 83.7% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Suriname and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
0.1%, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Suriname and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
Suriname ranks 171st and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 174th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/suriname/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/suriname/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Suriname vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release