Tanzania, United Republic of vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

Tanzania, United Republic of
79.9%
in 2021
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
83.7%
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
177th
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
174th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
020406080199420092024

How they compare

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification currently reports 83.7% against 79.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 3.8%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 177th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 174th of 199 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 1 and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Difference Ahead
2000s 81.3% 77.1% 4.2% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 74.8% 82.5% 7.7% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2020s 80.5% 85.0% 4.5% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Tanzania, United Republic of or WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, at 83.7% against 79.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Tanzania, United Republic of and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
3.8%, with WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 177th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 174th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/tanzania/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/tanzania/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release