AIMS: East Asia vs Iraq: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
AIMS: East Asia
99.0%
in 2024
Iraq
100.8%
in 2007
AIMS: East Asia rank
81st
Iraq rank
84th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 100.8% against 99.0% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, AIMS: East Asia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 81st and Iraq ranks 84th of 221 groups.
AIMS: East Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.4% | 87.2% | 12.2% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2000s | 99.9% | 93.2% | 6.7% | AIMS: East Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, AIMS: East Asia or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 100.8% against 99.0% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between AIMS: East Asia and Iraq?
- 1.8%, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Iraq?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2007.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Iraq rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 81st and Iraq ranks 84th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release