Tokelau vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male

Tokelau
60.9%
in 2025
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
83.7%
in 2024
Tokelau rank
195th
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) rank
197th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time

  • Tokelau
  • WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
020406080100199720112025

How they compare

WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) currently reports 83.7% against 60.9% in Tokelau, a difference of 22.8%.

That makes WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)'s figure about 1.4 times Tokelau's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tokelau ahead.

Tokelau ranks 195th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 197th of 199 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Tokelau averaged higher in 2 and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tokelau WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) Difference Ahead
2000s 83.6% 72.6% 11.0% Tokelau
2010s 88.0% 84.0% 4.0% Tokelau
2020s 68.8% 84.1% 15.3% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Tokelau or WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income), at 83.7% against 60.9% in Tokelau as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Tokelau and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
22.8%, with WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tokelau and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Tokelau and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
Tokelau ranks 195th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 197th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tokelau vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/tokelau/wb-sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/tokelau/wb-sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Tokelau vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,306 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release