AIMS: Pacific vs Eswatini: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes
AIMS: Pacific
100.8%
in 2024
Eswatini
106.9%
in 2016
AIMS: Pacific rank
34th
Eswatini rank
32nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 106.9% against 100.8% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1999 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 32nd of 221 groups.
AIMS: Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 101.5% | 77.3% | 24.2% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2000s | 100.7% | 83.2% | 17.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 105.6% | 102.5% | 3.1% | AIMS: Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes, AIMS: Pacific or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 106.9% against 100.8% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes between AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini?
- 6.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 34th and Eswatini ranks 32nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release