Tanzania vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes

Tanzania
69.0%
in 2021
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
73.2%
in 2024
Tanzania rank
189th
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) rank
191st

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes over time

  • Tanzania
  • WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
20406080197019972024

How they compare

WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) currently reports 73.2% against 69.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 4.2%.

That makes WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)'s figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1970 it was WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ahead.

Tanzania ranks 189th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 191st of 211 countries.

WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) Difference Ahead
1970s 36.6% 39.5% 2.9% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
1980s 50.1% 51.3% 1.1% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
1990s 41.9% 50.8% 8.8% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
2010s 65.4% 71.8% 6.3% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)
2020s 69.6% 73.5% 4.0% WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes, Tanzania or WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income), at 73.2% against 69.0% in Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes between Tanzania and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
4.2%, with WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income)?
37 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Tanzania and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes?
Tanzania ranks 189th and WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income) ranks 191st of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/tanzania/wb-sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/tanzania/wb-sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Tanzania vs WB: Sub-saharan Africa (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
432 places, 16,352 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release