WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
74.4%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
80.2%
in 2013
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
175th
Zimbabwe rank
173rd

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes over time

  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
  • Zimbabwe
406080100197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 80.2% against 74.4% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, a difference of 5.8%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 173rd of 221 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 36.6% 44.9% 8.4% Zimbabwe
1980s 43.3% 84.2% 41.0% Zimbabwe
1990s 47.1% 76.3% 29.2% Zimbabwe
2000s 56.3% 77.8% 21.6% Zimbabwe
2010s 72.1% 80.7% 8.5% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes, WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 80.2% against 74.4% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes between WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification and Zimbabwe?
5.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2013.
How do WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes?
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 173rd of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-both-sexes-percent-2/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/zimbabwe/">WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
432 places, 16,352 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release