Brazil vs Early-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes over time
- Brazil
- Early-demographic dividend
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 107.8% against 87.2% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 20.6%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 30th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 29th of 197 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Early-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 113.0% | 78.7% | 34.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 107.8% | 84.8% | 22.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes, Brazil or Early-demographic dividend?
- Brazil, at 107.8% against 87.2% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes between Brazil and Early-demographic dividend?
- 20.6%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Early-demographic dividend?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Brazil and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes?
- Brazil ranks 30th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 29th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.