AIMS: Central Asia vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
AIMS: Central Asia
94.2%
in 2024
Timor-Leste
99.4%
in 2020
AIMS: Central Asia rank
81st
Timor-Leste rank
81st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 99.4% against 94.2% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 5.2%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 81st and Timor-Leste ranks 81st of 221 groups.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.4% | 93.3% | 3.0% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 92.4% | 101.5% | 9.1% | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 92.3% | 99.4% | 7.1% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, AIMS: Central Asia or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 99.4% against 94.2% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between AIMS: Central Asia and Timor-Leste?
- 5.2%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 81st and Timor-Leste ranks 81st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release