AIMS: Pacific vs Liechtenstein: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
AIMS: Pacific
99.4%
in 2024
Liechtenstein
105.7%
in 2021
AIMS: Pacific rank
38th
Liechtenstein rank
38th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 105.7% against 99.4% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 38th and Liechtenstein ranks 38th of 221 groups.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.4% | 103.2% | 3.8% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 102.2% | 103.4% | 1.1% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 100.4% | 106.2% | 5.7% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, AIMS: Pacific or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 105.7% against 99.4% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2021.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between AIMS: Pacific and Liechtenstein?
- 6.3%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Liechtenstein?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Liechtenstein rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 38th and Liechtenstein ranks 38th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release