AIMS: Pacific vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
AIMS: Pacific
99.4%
in 2024
Namibia
106.3%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
38th
Namibia rank
35th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 106.3% against 99.4% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 6.9%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1999 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 38th and Namibia ranks 35th of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 101.5% | 96.5% | 5.0% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2000s | 99.6% | 94.1% | 5.5% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 102.4% | 103.5% | 1.1% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 99.8% | 106.5% | 6.7% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, AIMS: Pacific or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 106.3% against 99.4% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between AIMS: Pacific and Namibia?
- 6.9%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 38th and Namibia ranks 35th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release