Bangladesh vs ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female

Bangladesh
87.6%
in 2024
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
79.1%
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
149th
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank
147th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time

  • Bangladesh
  • ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
20406080197019972024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 87.6% against 79.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427), a difference of 8.5%.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1973 it was ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 149th and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 147th of 206 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) Difference Ahead
1970s 28.7% 47.7% 19.0% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
1980s 31.6% 52.8% 21.3% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
1990s 39.2% 54.8% 15.6% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2000s 68.6% 53.8% 14.8% Bangladesh
2010s 80.3% 73.3% 7.0% Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Bangladesh or ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)?
Bangladesh, at 87.6% against 79.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Bangladesh and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)?
8.5%, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)?
21 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2018.
How do Bangladesh and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
Bangladesh ranks 149th and ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 147th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/bangladesh/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/bangladesh/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/">Bangladesh vs ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
427 places, 15,554 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release