ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
98.6%
in 2024
Libya
105.0%
in 2006
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
45th
Libya rank
44th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
  • Libya
0255075100125197119972024

How they compare

Libya currently reports 105.0% against 98.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 6.4%.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1975 it was ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ahead.

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 45th and Libya ranks 44th of 221 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 82.6% 73.3% 9.3% ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
1980s 68.5% 83.4% 14.9% Libya
2000s 86.4% 107.1% 20.7% Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) or Libya?
Libya, at 105.0% against 98.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2006.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya?
6.4%, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya?
13 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2006.
How do ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 45th and Libya ranks 44th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/libya/">ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
427 places, 15,554 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release