ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Papua New Guinea: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
76.7%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
85.2%
in 2023
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) rank
157th
Papua New Guinea rank
158th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
  • Papua New Guinea
20406080197019972024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 85.2% against 76.7% in ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407), a difference of 8.5%.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1970 it was ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ahead.

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 158th of 221 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 47.0% 26.5% 20.5% ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
1980s 50.2% 39.3% 11.0% ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
1990s 53.3% 42.7% 10.5% ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
2010s 68.4% 72.1% 3.7% Papua New Guinea
2020s 72.3% 78.7% 6.5% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 85.2% against 76.7% in ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Papua New Guinea?
8.5%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Papua New Guinea?
23 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 158th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Papua New Guinea: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/papua-new-guinea/">ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Papua New Guinea: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
427 places, 15,554 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release