ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Somalia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
67.9%
in 2022
Somalia
9.1%
in 2023
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) rank
209th
Somalia rank
206th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
  • Somalia
0204060197019962023

How they compare

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) currently reports 67.9% against 9.1% in Somalia, a difference of 58.8%.

That makes ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)'s figure about 7.5 times Somalia's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 209th and Somalia ranks 206th of 221 groups.

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) Somalia Difference Ahead
1970s 30.7% 8.9% 21.8% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
1980s 36.4% 11.2% 25.2% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
2000s 57.9% 11.1% 46.8% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) or Somalia?
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439), at 67.9% against 9.1% in Somalia as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Somalia?
58.8%, with ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Somalia?
16 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2007.
How do ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Somalia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 209th and Somalia ranks 206th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Somalia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-wb-low-income-economies-wb-low-unsdcode-98439/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-wb-low-income-economies-wb-low-unsdcode-98439/somalia-fed-rep/">ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Somalia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
427 places, 15,554 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release