Estonia vs Low & middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Estonia
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 106.9% against 85.7% in Low & middle income, a difference of 21.2%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 33rd and Low & middle income ranks 31st of 193 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.2% | 68.3% | 28.9% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 101.3% | 76.1% | 25.2% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 104.6% | 85.4% | 19.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Estonia or Low & middle income?
- Estonia, at 106.9% against 85.7% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Estonia and Low & middle income?
- 21.2%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Low & middle income?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and Low & middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Estonia ranks 33rd and Low & middle income ranks 31st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.