IDA blend vs Israel: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
IDA blend
67.8%
in 2019
Israel
105.8%
in 2018
IDA blend rank
45th
Israel rank
40th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- IDA blend
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 105.8% against 67.8% in IDA blend, a difference of 38.0%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.6 times IDA blend's.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 45th and Israel ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 35.5% | 93.8% | 58.2% | Israel |
| 1980s | 49.0% | 97.5% | 48.5% | Israel |
| 1990s | 50.1% | 98.5% | 48.4% | Israel |
| 2000s | 57.1% | 105.5% | 48.3% | Israel |
| 2010s | 65.8% | 105.3% | 39.5% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, IDA blend or Israel?
- Israel, at 105.8% against 67.8% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between IDA blend and Israel?
- 38.0%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Israel?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2018.
- How do IDA blend and Israel rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- IDA blend ranks 45th and Israel ranks 40th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.