IDA total vs Norway: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
IDA total
72.7%
in 2019
Norway
106.8%
in 2018
IDA total rank
38th
Norway rank
35th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- IDA total
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 106.8% against 72.7% in IDA total, a difference of 34.1%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times IDA total's.
Across all 48 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 38th and Norway ranks 35th of 45 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32.6% | 95.4% | 62.8% | Norway |
| 1980s | 42.5% | 98.3% | 55.7% | Norway |
| 1990s | 46.7% | 105.1% | 58.4% | Norway |
| 2000s | 59.1% | 106.1% | 47.0% | Norway |
| 2010s | 70.3% | 105.8% | 35.5% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, IDA total or Norway?
- Norway, at 106.8% against 72.7% in IDA total as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between IDA total and Norway?
- 34.1%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Norway?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
- How do IDA total and Norway rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- IDA total ranks 38th and Norway ranks 35th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.