Lithuania vs Low income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Lithuania
105.5%
in 2018
Low income
69.2%
in 2018
Lithuania rank
42nd
Low income rank
43rd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Lithuania
- Low income
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 105.5% against 69.2% in Low income, a difference of 36.3%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times Low income's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 43rd of 193 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.6% | 40.0% | 52.6% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 102.8% | 54.7% | 48.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 104.3% | 67.9% | 36.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Lithuania or Low income?
- Lithuania, at 105.5% against 69.2% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Lithuania and Low income?
- 36.3%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Low income?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Low income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Lithuania ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 43rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.