Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Lithuania
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 105.5% against 71.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 34.5%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 40th of 193 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.6% | 48.2% | 44.4% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 102.8% | 59.3% | 43.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 104.3% | 70.4% | 34.0% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Lithuania, at 105.5% against 71.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 34.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Lithuania ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 40th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.