Macau, China vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Macau, China
100.6%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
100.8%
in 2019
Macau, China rank
72nd
Timor-Leste rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Macau, China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 100.8% against 100.6% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 72nd and Timor-Leste ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.6% | 84.5% | 4.0% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 95.6% | 98.9% | 3.3% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Macau, China or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 100.8% against 100.6% in Macau, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Macau, China and Timor-Leste?
- 0.2%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Timor-Leste?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Macau, China and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Macau, China ranks 72nd and Timor-Leste ranks 71st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.