ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
74.6%
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
67.8%
in 2021
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) rank
188th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
188th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male over time
- ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) currently reports 74.6% against 67.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 6.8%.
That makes ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)'s figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1970 it was ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ahead.
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 188th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 188th of 221 groups.
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 46.1% | 42.4% | 3.7% | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) |
| 1980s | 50.8% | 49.7% | 1.1% | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) |
| 1990s | 50.0% | 42.3% | 7.7% | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) |
| 2010s | 74.3% | 64.9% | 9.3% | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) |
| 2020s | 76.5% | 68.5% | 8.0% | ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male, ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439), at 74.6% against 67.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male between ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6.8%, with ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male?
- ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 188th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 188th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release