Brazil vs Lower middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male
Brazil
106.4%
in 2011
Lower middle income
82.4%
in 2019
Brazil rank
35th
Lower middle income rank
33rd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male over time
- Brazil
- Lower middle income
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 106.4% against 82.4% in Lower middle income, a difference of 24.0%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 35th and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Lower middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.1% | 77.0% | 34.1% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 106.4% | 81.6% | 24.8% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male, Brazil or Lower middle income?
- Brazil, at 106.4% against 82.4% in Lower middle income as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male between Brazil and Lower middle income?
- 24.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lower middle income?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Brazil and Lower middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male?
- Brazil ranks 35th and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.