Hong Kong, China vs Slovenia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male
Hong Kong, China
107.9%
in 2019
Slovenia
107.6%
in 2018
Hong Kong, China rank
29th
Slovenia rank
31st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 107.9% against 107.6% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 193 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.2% | 91.4% | 3.1% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 105.7% | 105.3% | 0.4% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male, Hong Kong, China or Slovenia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 107.9% against 107.6% in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male between Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
- 0.3%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Slovenia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.