Lithuania vs Small states: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male
Lithuania
108.2%
in 2018
Small states
90.5%
in 2019
Lithuania rank
26th
Small states rank
25th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male over time
- Lithuania
- Small states
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 108.2% against 90.5% in Small states, a difference of 17.7%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Small states's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 26th and Small states ranks 25th of 193 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.7% | 82.4% | 10.3% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 103.7% | 87.9% | 15.8% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 107.2% | 90.2% | 17.0% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male, Lithuania or Small states?
- Lithuania, at 108.2% against 90.5% in Small states as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male between Lithuania and Small states?
- 17.7%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Small states?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Small states rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male?
- Lithuania ranks 26th and Small states ranks 25th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.