AIMS: East Asia vs Hong Kong, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female
AIMS: East Asia
100.1%
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
101.6%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia rank
91st
Hong Kong, China rank
90th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 101.6% against 100.1% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: East Asia ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 91st and Hong Kong, China ranks 90th of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107.3% | 100.8% | 6.5% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2010s | 102.5% | 104.2% | 1.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 102.9% | 3.0% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary, female, AIMS: East Asia or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 101.6% against 100.1% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary, female between AIMS: East Asia and Hong Kong, China?
- 1.5%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Hong Kong, China?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 91st and Hong Kong, China ranks 90th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release