Canada vs MDG: Sub-saharan Africa: Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female
Canada
95.1%
in 2023
MDG: Sub-saharan Africa
96.0%
in 2024
Canada rank
159th
MDG: Sub-saharan Africa rank
161st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female over time
- Canada
- MDG: Sub-saharan Africa
How they compare
MDG: Sub-saharan Africa currently reports 96.0% against 95.1% in Canada, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 159th and MDG: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 161st of 214 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | MDG: Sub-saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.2% | 85.0% | 14.2% | Canada |
| 2010s | 98.8% | 93.0% | 5.8% | Canada |
| 2020s | 95.6% | 95.5% | 0.1% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary, female, Canada or MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- MDG: Sub-saharan Africa, at 96.0% against 95.1% in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary, female between Canada and MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 0.9%, with MDG: Sub-saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Canada and MDG: Sub-saharan Africa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary, female?
- Canada ranks 159th and MDG: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 161st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release