New Zealand vs UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa: Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male
New Zealand
96.6%
in 2024
UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa
98.2%
in 2024
New Zealand rank
151st
UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa rank
151st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male over time
- New Zealand
- UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa
How they compare
UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa currently reports 98.2% against 96.6% in New Zealand, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 151st and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 151st of 214 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.6% | 93.6% | 6.0% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 98.6% | 98.4% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 98.3% | 1.3% | UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary, male, New Zealand or UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa?
- UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa, at 98.2% against 96.6% in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary, male between New Zealand and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 1.6%, with UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary, male?
- New Zealand ranks 151st and UNICEF: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 151st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release