Naoero vs UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity
Naoero
1.08 GPIA
in 2008
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
1.03 GPIA
in 2023
Naoero rank
61st
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank
64th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity over time
- Naoero
- UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 1.08 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific, a difference of 0.05 GPIA.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 61st and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 64th of 186 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity, Naoero or UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- Naoero, at 1.08 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific as of 2008.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity between Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- 0.05 GPIA, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity?
- Naoero ranks 61st and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 64th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release