Nauru vs WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity
Nauru
1.08 GPIA
in 2008
WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income)
1.04 GPIA
in 2023
Nauru rank
61st
WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income) rank
61st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity over time
- Nauru
- WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income)
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 1.08 GPIA against 1.04 GPIA in WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income), a difference of 0.04 GPIA.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 61st and WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income) ranks 61st of 186 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity, Nauru or WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income)?
- Nauru, at 1.08 GPIA against 1.04 GPIA in WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income) as of 2008.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity between Nauru and WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income)?
- 0.04 GPIA, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Nauru and WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity?
- Nauru ranks 61st and WB: East Asia & Pacific (excluding High Income) ranks 61st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release