Naoero vs WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd): Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity
Naoero
1.08 GPIA
in 2008
WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)
1.04 GPIA
in 2023
Naoero rank
61st
WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) rank
58th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity over time
- Naoero
- WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 1.08 GPIA against 1.04 GPIA in WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd), a difference of 0.04 GPIA.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 61st and WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity, Naoero or WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)?
- Naoero, at 1.08 GPIA against 1.04 GPIA in WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) as of 2008.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity between Naoero and WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)?
- 0.04 GPIA, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Naoero and WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity?
- Naoero ranks 61st and WB: East Asia & Pacific (ida & Ibrd) ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release