ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
63.9%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
64.1%
in 2013
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
155th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes over time
- ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 64.1% against 63.9% in ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114), a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 212 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.7% | 59.0% | 16.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 47.4% | 58.9% | 11.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 59.0% | 64.2% | 5.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes, ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 64.1% against 63.9% in ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes between ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
- How do ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes?
- ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release