Hong Kong vs Late-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes over time
- Hong Kong
- Late-demographic dividend
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 101.3% against 84.5% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 16.8%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 17th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 181 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes, Hong Kong or Late-demographic dividend?
- Hong Kong, at 101.3% against 84.5% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes between Hong Kong and Late-demographic dividend?
- 16.8%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Late-demographic dividend?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes?
- Hong Kong ranks 17th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of primary school age, secondary school age, and the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.