AIMS: Central Asia vs Aruba: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
AIMS: Central Asia
84.6%
in 2024
Aruba
89.3%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
78th
Aruba rank
80th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Aruba
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 89.3% against 84.6% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 78th and Aruba ranks 80th of 212 groups.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Aruba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.1% | 80.7% | 11.7% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 71.5% | 87.8% | 16.3% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 70.0% | 87.1% | 17.1% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 84.6% | 89.3% | 4.7% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, AIMS: Central Asia or Aruba?
- Aruba, at 89.3% against 84.6% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba?
- 4.7%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Aruba rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 78th and Aruba ranks 80th of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release