AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
88.4%
in 2023
Belarus
91.4%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
65th
Belarus rank
68th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 91.4% against 88.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 3.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 65th and Belarus ranks 68th of 212 groups.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 78.8% | 102.8% | 24.0% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 86.8% | 93.7% | 7.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 91.4% against 88.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
- 3.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 65th and Belarus ranks 68th of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release