AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Peru: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
88.4%
in 2023
Peru
92.9%
in 2017
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
65th
Peru rank
64th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 92.9% against 88.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 4.5%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 65th and Peru ranks 64th of 212 groups.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.2% | 79.8% | 13.7% | Peru |
| 2010s | 81.5% | 93.3% | 11.9% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Peru?
- Peru, at 92.9% against 88.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Peru?
- 4.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Peru rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 65th and Peru ranks 64th of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release