ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) vs Nauru: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%) (ratio female)
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
61.6%
in 2021
Nauru
57.5%
in 2008
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) rank
158th
Nauru rank
161st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%) (ratio female) over time
- ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)
- Nauru
How they compare
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) currently reports 61.6% against 57.5% in Nauru, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114)'s figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 158th and Nauru ranks 161st of 212 groups.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) or Nauru?
- ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114), at 61.6% against 57.5% in Nauru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Nauru?
- 4.1%, with ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Nauru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) and Nauru rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- ECA: Eac (unsdcode:98114) ranks 158th and Nauru ranks 161st of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release