ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
64.9%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
62.1%
in 2013
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
153rd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) currently reports 64.9% against 62.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.8%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 153rd of 212 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.9% | 54.4% | 9.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 46.8% | 55.0% | 8.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 60.0% | 62.2% | 2.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) or Zimbabwe?
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110), at 64.9% against 62.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe?
- 2.8%, with ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
- How do ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 153rd of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release