ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) vs Naoero: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405)
60.2%
in 2024
Naoero
57.5%
in 2008
ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) rank
163rd
Naoero rank
161st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405)
- Naoero
How they compare
ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) currently reports 60.2% against 57.5% in Naoero, a difference of 2.7%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) ranks 163rd and Naoero ranks 161st of 212 groups.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) or Naoero?
- ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405), at 60.2% against 57.5% in Naoero as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) and Naoero?
- 2.7%, with ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) and Naoero?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) and Naoero rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- ESCAP: Africa (afr) (unsdcode:98405) ranks 163rd and Naoero ranks 161st of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release