ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female

ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)
73.2%
in 2024
Rwanda
77.0%
in 2024
ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) rank
121st
Rwanda rank
120th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time

  • ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)
  • Rwanda
20406080197119972024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 77.0% against 73.2% in ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420), a difference of 3.8%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 120th of 212 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 51.0% 53.3% 2.3% Rwanda
2010s 66.6% 70.2% 3.7% Rwanda
2020s 71.9% 75.2% 3.2% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 77.0% against 73.2% in ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) and Rwanda?
3.8%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) and Rwanda?
18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 120th of 212 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-to-tertiary-female-percent-2/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa-unsdcode-98420/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-to-tertiary-female-percent-2/escap-south-and-south-west-asia-sswa-unsdcode-98420/rwanda/">ESCAP: South and South-west Asia (sswa) (unsdcode:98420) vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
398 places, 8,902 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release