MDG: Developing Regions vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
MDG: Developing Regions
74.8%
in 2024
Rwanda
77.0%
in 2024
MDG: Developing Regions rank
117th
Rwanda rank
120th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- MDG: Developing Regions
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 77.0% against 74.8% in MDG: Developing Regions, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was MDG: Developing Regions ahead.
MDG: Developing Regions ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 120th of 212 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, MDG: Developing Regions averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Developing Regions | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.4% | 53.3% | 5.1% | MDG: Developing Regions |
| 2010s | 69.2% | 70.2% | 1.0% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 74.1% | 75.2% | 1.1% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, MDG: Developing Regions or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 77.0% against 74.8% in MDG: Developing Regions as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda?
- 2.2%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do MDG: Developing Regions and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- MDG: Developing Regions ranks 117th and Rwanda ranks 120th of 212 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release