Rwanda vs WB: Small States: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
Rwanda
77.0%
in 2024
WB: Small States
74.1%
in 2024
Rwanda rank
120th
WB: Small States rank
119th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- Rwanda
- WB: Small States
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 77.0% against 74.1% in WB: Small States, a difference of 2.9%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was WB: Small States ahead.
Rwanda ranks 120th and WB: Small States ranks 119th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and WB: Small States in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | WB: Small States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.3% | 66.6% | 13.2% | WB: Small States |
| 2010s | 70.2% | 72.2% | 1.9% | WB: Small States |
| 2020s | 75.2% | 74.8% | 0.4% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, Rwanda or WB: Small States?
- Rwanda, at 77.0% against 74.1% in WB: Small States as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between Rwanda and WB: Small States?
- 2.9%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and WB: Small States?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and WB: Small States rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- Rwanda ranks 120th and WB: Small States ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release