WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female

WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd)
63.5%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
62.1%
in 2013
WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) rank
153rd
Zimbabwe rank
153rd

Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time

  • WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd)
  • Zimbabwe
020406080198320032024

How they compare

WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) currently reports 63.5% against 62.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.4%.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 153rd of 212 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 44.8% 54.4% 9.6% Zimbabwe
2000s 46.0% 55.0% 9.0% Zimbabwe
2010s 54.1% 62.2% 8.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) or Zimbabwe?
WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd), at 63.5% against 62.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe?
1.4%, with WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
How do WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 153rd of 212 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-to-tertiary-female-percent-2/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-to-tertiary-female-percent-2/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">WB: Middle East & North Africa (ida & Ibrd) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
398 places, 8,902 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release