Nauru vs UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male
Nauru
53.0%
in 2008
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
61.1%
in 2020
Nauru rank
174th
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank
171st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male over time
- Nauru
- UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa
How they compare
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa currently reports 61.1% against 53.0% in Nauru, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa's figure about 1.2 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 174th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 171st of 186 countries.
UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male, Nauru or UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
- UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa, at 61.1% against 53.0% in Nauru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male between Nauru and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
- 8.1%, with UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Nauru and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male?
- Nauru ranks 174th and UNICEF: Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release