East Asia & Pacific vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.2% against 79.8% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 17.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 19th of 45 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.1% | 76.3% | 10.2% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 67.7% | 84.9% | 17.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 75.5% | 90.0% | 14.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male, East Asia & Pacific or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 97.2% against 79.8% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male between East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
- 17.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 19th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of primary school age, secondary school age, and the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.