AIMS: East Asia vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes
AIMS: East Asia
91.8%
in 2024
Libya
97.6%
in 2006
AIMS: East Asia rank
75th
Libya rank
77th
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 97.6% against 91.8% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: East Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1971 it was AIMS: East Asia ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 75th and Libya ranks 77th of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 48.5% | 35.4% | 13.1% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 1980s | 41.1% | 63.7% | 22.5% | Libya |
| 2000s | 67.9% | 102.2% | 34.3% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes, AIMS: East Asia or Libya?
- Libya, at 97.6% against 91.8% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes between AIMS: East Asia and Libya?
- 5.8%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Libya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2006.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 75th and Libya ranks 77th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release